Foreshades of Grey (8)

or, Perversion of Innocence

toilet of venus

Boucher, The Toilet of Venus 1751 Oil on canvas, Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York,
“commissioned by Madame de Pompadour as part of the decoration for her cabinet de toilette at the Château de Bellevue, one of the residences she shared with Louis XV”. Text and image source: Web Gallery of Art

Whipping up salacious fantasies of royal sexual perversion became a key part of revolutionary propaganda, but the worst accusations of depravity were always reserved for women.

Even the rumour that Louis XV had fathered a child on one of his own daughters, Marie-Adelaide, seems to have been aimed more at crushing her limited influence at court than attacking the king’s depravity.

The chief victim of misogyny was the king’s granddaughter-in-law, Marie Antoinette, who was accused at her trial of sexually abusing her own son.

AdolfUlrikWertmüllerAdolf Ulrik Wertmüller, Marie Antoinette and her two eldest children walking in the park of Trianon (1785) oil on canvas, Nationalmuseum Sweden. Image source: Wikipedia.
Like any conscientious mother trapped in a rigid class system, the queen was doing her best to bring up her children with enlightened modern values, in this case the Rousseauian ideals of lots of fresh air and simple clothes.

The new ideas about upper-class women being allowed free expression of maternal emotion were extolled in fashionable portraiture, and were then perverted by Marie Antoinette’s political opponents in the most inhumane way conceivable to discredit her, the mother turned into whore, the ultimate degradation of the “Austrian bitch”.

vigee lebrun daughterVigée-Lebrun, Self-portrait with her daughter Julie, c. 1789 oil on canvas Musée du Louvre, Paris. Image source: WGA.
Marie Antoinette promoted the careers of many women artists through her patronage. She used Vigée-Lebrun frequently to try and improve her public image as an enlightened, not spoilt and despotic, queen, whose sensibility was the same as any other devoted mother’s of her time.

For years before the Revolution, Marie Antoinette had featured in pornographic prints of lesbianism, a subject of fascination and confusion to 18th century erotic sub-culture for men and Romantic idealism of both sexes. The Ladies of Llangollen were admired for living virtuously together in rural retreat because of their refusal to submit to marriages of convenience; Queen Charlotte’s intercession to get them a pension wasn’t based on the possibility that women might be happier having physical relationships with one another rather than with men.

diana resting after her bath

Boucher, Diana Resting after her Bath 1742 Oil on canvas, Musée du Louvre, Paris. Image source: WGA
Here, in the most intimate picture of a podiatrist and her client ever presented, Boucher celebrates feminine sensuality with more subtlety than in the flagrant eroticism of his odalisques.

The playful sensuality of Rococo imagery, of Venus tenderly embracing her son Eros, of happy cherubs dive-bombing naked nymphs, the suggestiveness of Boucher’s pastoral idylls, of nymphs and goddesses delighting in their own and each other’s nakedness, his version of the Rousseauian ideal of female sensibility which had inspired so many fashionable women to be candid about their feelings for one another, all this varnished innocence was inverted and made dirty.

georgianadevonshireandelizabethfosterGuérin Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire, with Lady Elizabeth Foster c. 1791
Miniature on ivory, Wallace Collection, London. Image source: WGA.
Female friendship and the benign influence of feminine sensitivity and refinement on culture and society as a whole was valued and celebrated.

10 comments on “Foreshades of Grey (8)

  1. vinnieh says:

    Thanks for checking through my blog, much appreciated. Glad you liked my Ladies posts, there are a few others like it if you’re interested.


  2. vinnieh says:

    Just looking through now Pete, couldn’t agree with you more.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. beetleypete says:

    You won’t be sorry you did Vinnie. Exquisite stuff.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. vinnieh says:

    Will have a look through your blog, it seems to have so much interesting content.


  5. PJR says:

    Thank you for a generous and kind comment – it is always a relief to find that someone has been engaged or entertained, and that one isn’t just talking to oneself, after all. I feel guilty whenever someone “follows” me because I am always afraid that there will be nothing to follow – the last post might well be the last….

    Liked by 1 person

  6. vinnieh says:

    You’ve got a really interesting and entertaining blog.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. beetleypete says:

    Perhaps we are more together ‘in mind’ than our backgrounds might suggest Pippa! I have often worried about the validity of historical ‘facts’ that are long-held to be true. Even contemporary writings cannot always be trusted, unfortunately.
    Looks like I am going to have to build that Time Machine after all!

    Thanks for an exquisite series. My best wishes to you as always. Pete.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. PJR says:

    I think “excesses” did happen in Louis XV’s case; he wasn’t the contemporary of de Sade and Casanova for nothing – and many of his courtiers must have been far more excessive – but let’s allow that his sex life was less sleazy than portrayed by his political enemies. He was not a DSK or Savile, but definitely a Kennedy, or a **** I probably shouldn’t name for legal reasons.

    The allegations against Marie Antoinette’s are offensive, whether she was a lesbian or not. The concept did not exist in her time, which is entirely different from mutual sensual enjoyment of each other, or consensual physical conjugation having taken place. There was a contemporary sympathy amongst intellectual social reformers towards oppressed women finding psychological comfort and sexual fulfillment through each other (eg Diderot’s The Nun, written in 1760).

    How extraordinary that you refer to history being written by the winners at the very moment I am wrestling with the same thing in another window of a drafted post. The thrills of online synchronicity. Today, we do not distinguish between historiography and history – TV costume dramas don’t help – that’s why in our time PR hype is more powerful than history itself. There are too many vested interests in retelling “history” nowadays, a business like moving house or death (don’t get me started).

    The fuss about Richard III’s reburial is hysteria, not history. Oh dear, is this another blog post, rather than a comment?

    Thank you, Pete!


  9. beetleypete says:

    If we allow that ‘The victors write the history’, then perhaps all these supposed excesses are simply propaganda, and nothing much happened at all. I like too think that it did though, much more interesting…
    As always, Pete.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s